.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Home

..

Topics

.

Reality and imagination 

.

Reality and imagination represent two possibilities in which we can all express our existence. 

.

Reality is obviously bound to the physical laws that guide matter and make our body work by a biological-sensory principle that can be improperly defined as "mechanical".  

.

Instead, through the imagination, everyone is able to assume an abstract conscience capable of giving an illusory meaning to everyone’s own existence. 

.

Basically, life includes in itself two distinct states:  in the first, the real one, we are all involved in prefixed physics rules that are impossible to change;  the second, the unreal one, regards the illusory meaning constructed on subjective directives derived by its own suppositions (imagination).  

.

Two different ways to exist that, in theory, would have to come out clearly separable, having their different prerogatives, while in truth we all know that things do not go exactly like this.  An unconscious mental refusal seems to exist that divides them, having ascertained that no will is manifested to put into effect one clear and specific distinction between them.  

.

It doesn’t establish any parameter of reference in order to separate 

.

the real truth from the abstract one,

.

it has induced the representatives of culture to make clamorous blunders in their decisions.  History is witness to how humanity has been persuaded to believe in suppositions that today appear evidently absurd, but that formerly were assumed as unquestionable truth. The adaptation to the environmental conditions has imposed to the successive generations those same suppositions making them last up to our time and persuading the majority of people to follow concepts that are mostly invented and counterproductive for men.  

.

It is indeed very important to have knowledge of true presuppositions on which many of those that today are sold as acclaimed truth are constructed.  In this text only some of them are examined.

.

.

Es: Creation, Big Bang and Black Holes.

.

Did God create the universe or did the universe always exist?  

.

How many rivers of ink have been used to resolve the issue.  How much time wasted, and above all how many speculations have been constructed on it.  By applying an objective analysis to our problem we will obtain only one direct, incontestable answer:  

.

the universe has always existed.  

.

To assert that this is not a simple supposition but the second law of thermodynamics, which imposes on us to accept it as an unquestionable law of the real world.  This law says that in the universe nothing is created, nothing is destroyed, everything is transformed.

.

Comments:

This law is written in the objectivity of the real world, proven by unquestionable scientific responses; therefore, it must be accepted, even from a theological point of view, 

.

as law sanctioned by God.

.

Until it is proven  that it is physically possible to create or destroy matter, such law must obligatorily be considered the only possible true solution to our question.

.

To support  the hypothesis of creation as the initial act of the existence of everything, it is indispensable to construct with the imagination an Entity capable of making it. But, in this way, it would violate the primary rule of objective research, which imposes us 

.

not to accept purely imaginary concepts.

.

The motivation that has induced the formulation of the hypothesis of "Creation" as work of a possible Divinity was born in times where it wasn’t possible to know how the world was really physically structured.  As a consequence, it was inevitable that men came to the wrong conclusions; that hypothesis was the truth of those times, times when things went very differently from how the public believes today.

.

Moreover, motivations exist, tied to the conditionings suffered by man in the course of the millennia, capable of explaining why humanity is still induced to believe in concepts not supported by rational analysis (untreated topics). 

.

The Big Bang and Black Holes theories are at present the most accredited to explain the beginning and the end of the universe.  These hypothesize a process in which everything has a beginning with the Big Bang and an end with the Black Hole.  Two hypothesis that are only a part of truth in that they take off from a universe that is an expression of only one unrepeatable existence.  Such theories are worthy of consideration because empirical tests exist that confirm them, while, rationally it is not sensible to think that the universe was born from nothing and finishes nowhere.  Lately, a theory was published in near silence that results as being the only one that respects the rules required by rational objectivity:  the continuous cycle between the Big Bang and black holes.  Briefly:  an infinite amount of matter-energy is compressed in one infinitesimal dimension until it explodes, generating the matter of the universe.  With the Big Bang, the energy is freed in order to assume the typical dimension of our universe.  The developed matter is made up of hydrogen atoms, namely atoms that internally possess the maximum potential energy.  In time, the atoms combine, emitting energy to form new chemical compounds.  With these transformations they become heavier, while the space gets warm from the heat emitted during the transformations. When the matter, by the effect of gravity, is aggregated enough to form a Black Hole, this attracts towards itself not only the matter, but also every form of energy dispersed in space.  At this point, the final act closes the circle:  the enormous gravitation of the Black Hole, before arriving at the critical point, re-inserts the energy on the inside of every single atom, regenerating it and re-establishing the initial situation for a new Big Bang.  

.

This is only one of many theories expressed on Creation, but it represents the only one that does not transgress the laws of thermodynamics.  At the same time, it denies the existence of that “nothing”, scientifically unacceptable, from which the Entity who created the universe, according to religious allegations, would have had to derive.  

________________________________________________________________________________

Home

..

Topics