Home

.

Introduction

.

Topics

..

Indictment

.

Cultural void

.

Notes

This project was born from a need to answer a simple question,in scientific terms:

.

what exists after death?

Everyone has an interest in answering this question, however, it is difficult to propose a correct analysis because there are enormous interests preventing people from learning about how things are in reality. A prohibitive stance that hinders the evolution towards a new world, a world brings prosperity to all and no longer corrupt and ruthless pert the majority of human beings.

.

This research intends to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that not only the poor but also the powerful, have a great interest in changing the way they think about themselves and the community. A change imposed through a superior knowledge in order to explain why there are so many versions of reality. A reality which, on the contrary, is unique because it is determined by immutable physical-chemical laws.  Knowledge that counteracts a culture that does everything to conceal the true meaning of human transcendence. Meaning imposed on reality by the only acceptable higher power:

.

that of a rational God understandable to everyone through the use of reason.

.

After millennia in which spiritual values were expressed by untested entities, based on faith, it's time for man to assess with new eyes other responsibilities transcendental values. It 'time for humanity to open itself to a new wave of thought that looks to its "existence" within meanings that are logical, rational and scientifically concrete. 

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Our journey begins 

.

with a famous personage from the past: an example of how the powers have always used censorship to hide reality.

.

.

In 1600 a certain Galileo Galilei showed to the cultural and religious world, the scientific observations that refuted the Ptolemaic theory. Theory which placed the Earth at the center of the universe.  The new Copernican theory supported by Galileo, however, contradicted what was accepted by the highest authorities. Imprisoned and threatened with torture, he was forced to abjure publicly. Convicted to prison for life, the sentence was served in his home..

These, in summary, are the significant historical facts known about this distinguished scientist. However, there is a very disturbing aspect to the story: the importance of not disclosing the information given by Galileo was due to the discredit which the then religious power would suffer from these new "revelations". Today we all know what is the truth, but, at that time things followed a different judgement: to reveal uncomfortable truths, such as those proposed by Galileo, was not exactly convenient to them: to reveal uncomfortable truths, such as those proposed by Galileo, was not exactly "healthy".

.

What would have happened if, assuming for example, the institutions had accepted the new observations by Galileo, which is more scientifically indisputable, not as  heresy but as:

.

.

.

It is logical to imagine how everything would have been different today if: scientific research had evolved from that era. On the contrary, science has had to wait centuries before the spread and impose itself as an instrument of great social utility. 
Even now, religious institutions have considerable difficulty to accept any dialogue with the objectivity of science.

.

All this highlights an "paradoxical" aspect of the dispute. Delay the development of scientific research for centuries has meant for humanity: 

.

ignorance, suffering, death and misery for an unimaginable number of people.

.

Huge responsibility to those who, even today, are encouraged to deny the indisputable scientific facts.

.

.

.

.

.

Since the origins of civilization only two directives on human life have existed, expressed in a nutshell by religious faith and atheism. Two strategies of thought that have marked, for better or for worse, the life span of humanity. After millennia of evolution, you can now access an additional level of knowledge built on new values. Values fated to form the primary directive of future generations. Knowledge meant to denounce 

.

the largest scam perpetrated against humanity.

.

Revelations that structurally alter the way to conceive the spirituality of the individual, in order to separate once for all the rational man from superstition and ignorance.

.

It 's time that every human being claimed for himself the right to know the true meaning of our existence. This true meaning, for the first time, is rationally related to concrete and indisputable investigations. It 's time that people learn to distinguish the real truth rather than those built on pure imagination and presumption: a way to say "enough" to hypocrisy, false information and the manipulation of the human mind.

.

The existential thesis presented here can and should not be absent in the cultural baggage of each person, because it is the only one able to scientifically prove what the true destiny reserved for all human beings is. A revolutionary concept that changes every previous hypothesis on the creation and existence of man.

.

A new way of thinking, able to be understood by all: what are the right rules to guide the community. An acquisition of knowledge enabling all to respond rationally to the great questions of life to reveal what is the real price that we pay once crossed the border of death. A realistic alternative way of thinking, practical and empirical, situated at a abysmal distance from those assumptions of atheism and religious faith until now diffused.

.

A concept which is the only real opportunity given to man which makes it possible to create an evolved society on our planet. A vision of life which can offer the most convenient strategy to ensure a life worthy of the breed to which the man belongs.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. It is not a vague abstract theory, nor a simple philosophical hypothesis. It is not even a conception of faith or a belief in the fundamentals untested. .

.

.

. From this analysis emerges a secure sentence for those who, despite having considerable cultural, neglecting to investigate on the fundamental arguments for themselves and for humanity. .

.

.

.

A brief note to development analysis.

Topics

Topics